Ahead of the 9th Annual Stuart Hall Public Conversation in May 2026, our network of creative and intellectual practitioners gathered at Conway Hall for the SHF Peer Network Spring Workshop. There they were joined by keynote speaker, cultural theorist, poet and teacher of performance studies, Fred Moten, exchanging ideas around collectivity, individuality and oneness in intellectual pursuits.

Konstantin Helm, researcher, lecturer, and PhD candidate at the Department for English and American Studies at Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, shares their reflections on these events below.

Before I go to the workshop with Fred Moten, I read one of his books in an air-conditioned coffee shop in central London. Outside, the morning sun has already turned the air into syrup. It feels surreal to step outside and walk to Conway Hall. This is in part because both the city and its inhabitants seem mildly dazed by the weather. Mostly, it is because both the Stuart Hall Foundation workshops I’ve already attended felt so different from what I’m used to in Germany. There is something unique both about the individual expertise of facilitators and participants as well as our shared currents of thought. This unpredictable intellectual meteorology always left me enriched, but I enter feeling quite nervous, not knowing if I prepared well enough or well at all.

Fred Moten thanks us for joining him inside despite the sunshine. When he begins to speak, it immediately becomes clear that he is inviting us to move alongside him. Fred Moten thinks out loud, not as a lecturer, but to lay the groundwork for an afternoon of thinking through something, of thinking together. He sketches the problem between the I and the we, between the intellectual whose job it is to think for others and the inherently collective nature of reflection. The problem is difficult to grasp because it resists the language of objective knowledge, and because, as Fred Moten says, the “’we’ resists object permanence”. For the rest of the workshop, we put these ideas into conversation with Policing the Crisis. In this 1978 work, Stuart Hall and his co-authors think about a crisis that affects society as a whole. However, the crisis erupts most violently where authorities assault the racialised, the marginalised, and – Fred Moten again – the “irrelevants.” We close with an acute awareness of the suffocating world outside this room. Still, I leave full of ideas, a renewed sense of responsibility, and feeling that my work is part of a long, communal project.

The next day, at the Public Conversation, Fred Moten’s keynote speech “The Physics of Political Economy” is a modular exploration of the tension between empirical and phenomenological modes of knowing. His reflections move from du Bois’ metaphysics of race to the calculated uncertainties of quantum mechanics, from Newtonian gravity to the cold mathematics of genocide. At times, I am daunted by the vast, associative and poetic trajectory Fred Moten is taking us on. But often he pauses, looks up from his notes, and brings us back to central London on a sweltering afternoon. In Stolen Life, Fred Moten describes Black Studies as the possibility of “walking in another world while passing through this one.” I am grateful for his guidance in navigating both.

– Konstantin Helm, June 2026

Ahead of the 9th Annual Stuart Hall Public Conversation in May 2026, our network of creative and intellectual practitioners gathered at Conway Hall for the SHF Peer Network Spring Workshop. There they were joined by keynote speaker, cultural theorist, poet and teacher of performance studies, Fred Moten, exchanging ideas around collectivity, individuality and oneness in intellectual pursuits.

We commissioned SHF Peer Network member Erinma Ochu – currently Researcher in Residence with Watershed and Professor in Immersive Media at UWE Bristol – to share their reflections following the event.

The Stuart Hall Foundation’s annual workshop and public conversation is a scholarly highlight. This year’s workshop with Fred Moten – yes, Fred Moten (!) – built on the spirit of the Foundation’s monthly online peer meet-ups, facilitated by Ruth Ramsden-Karelse, as a lightly held, joyous space for collective thinking.

Across two sunny days at Conway Hall, organisers offered material enactments of care that enabled participation, particularly for disabled and caregiving attendees. This infrastructural care is an ethical stance: accessibility and interdependence are practiced methods as much as values.

Into this deliberately crafted environment, Moten brought two texts: Stuart Hall et al.’s ‘Policing the Crisis’ and Hortense Spillers’ ‘The Crisis of the Negro Intellectual’. Between his generative, admittedly provisional reflections and Ruth’s carefully selected quotes we traced the historical and contemporary implications of moral panics, emphasising the shift from consensual to coercive state governance. Arriving at the ‘empiricist attitude’ – state and academic tendencies to privilege ‘hard facts’ over ideology – we discussed how this shapes discourse and determines which lives matter.

We recognised that the current democratic crisis was upheld by Big Tech, platform capitalism, institutionalised EDI, and moral panics around gender, disability, and immigration. More time – perhaps a second workshop (?!) – might have allowed us to share and imagine strategies for resisting such determinant forces. For me, this includes valuing mutual learning as a practice to build community and solidarity.

I really valued that we had space for critical difference and plurality. Staying with this critical yet affirmative tension, creates an essential line of flight for generating new horizons beyond the current status quo.

I am still distilling Moten’s public conversation which I watched at home, online. His story about New Orlean’s Felicity Street which questioned whether life might be richer outside sanctioned measures of value – stayed with me. As current pressures intensify, this line of inquiry question may open up space for indeterminacy and poetic alternatives.

A final note: seeing photos from the event – recognising some faces, wondering about those I am yet to meet – I felt the collective energy they hold as an archive of living resistance and solidarity.

– Erinma Ochu, June 2026

Reading the Crisis asks: what kinds of tools and strategies are needed to confront this conjuncture? The online conversation series returns for a third year in an expanded format featuring six in-depth engagements with economics, technology, democracy, migration, culture and climate respectively.

Hosted by senior lecturer and former BBC Radio senior producer Aasiya Lodhi and critic, media theorist and editor of Representology K Biswas, each conversation forms an online teach-in space dedicated to demonstrating how engaging in a conjunctural analysis can enrich artistic practice and deepen organising work and academic study.

The second conversation of this year’s series took place on Tuesday 14th July 2026 with host K Biswas joined by Wendy Liu, author of Abolish Silicon Valley: How to Liberate Technology from Capitalism (2020), for a discussion focusing on technology.

Read a transcript of the event here:
https://www.stuarthallfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/RTC-2026-2-transcript.pdf

Supported by the Esmée Fairbairn Foundation, the Hollick Family Foundation, the Paul Hamlyn Foundation and the Power of Pop Fund.

Reading the Crisis is part of the Stuart Hall Foundation’s In Search of Common Ground programme. Learn more about In Search of Common Ground by clicking here.

For the 8th Annual Stuart Hall Public Conversation, the Stuart Hall Foundation welcomed political theorist, writer, activist, independent curator and political educator, Prof. Françoise Vergès as the keynote speaker. Taking place on Saturday 17th May at Conway Hall in London and online via livestream broadcast, the event inaugurated our 2025 programme, In Search of Common Ground.

Vergès’ keynote, titled ‘There Will Be No Future Without Seizing the Present’, considered how we might think across difference to construct a life-affirming politics in times of poly-crisis. The writer and activist posited that building common ground is building transnational solidarity, and urged against despair: “Let us think defeat as a chapter in the long fight for liberation and freedom.”

The keynote was preceded by a video excerpt from Stuart Hall’s Race, The Floating Signifier (1997) and an introductory address from SHF Executive Director Orsod Malik. After the keynote, Vergès was joined by Mohammed Elnaiem, Director of the Decolonial Centre, for a discussion and audience Q&A which further considered how we might understand Hall’s thinking on “a politics without guarantees”.

The event also featured the premiere screening of ‘The Audacity of Our Skin’. Featuring poet and essayist Selina Nwulu reading her newly revisited version of the titular work to camera, the filmed performance was shot and edited by videographer Alice Kanako and commissioned by the Stuart Hall Foundation supported by Comic Relief.

Following the event, attendees were invited to congregate at an informal reception, where they discussed ideas with programme contributors and with each other. Plant-based South Asian food catered by Goodness Gracious Feast and drinks from the bar were made available, while Newham Bookshop held a stall with titles related to the programme on offer.

Skin Deep hosted a pop-up library at the back of the hall, continuing their efforts to make space for creative thinking in service of and beyond racial justice. The library of liberatory texts offered attendees the opportunity to relax and flip through back prints of the Skin Deep magazine, pick up their latest issue and delve into their sources of inspiration.

Read a transcript of the event recording.

View photography from the event.

Supported by Comic Relief, the Hollick Family Foundation and the Paul Hamlyn Foundation, in collaboration with Conway Hall, Words of Colour and Pluto Press.